U.S. domestic UAP and drone waves

What this topic covers

This hub tracks U.S. domestic UAP and drone-wave reporting, with a focus on the gap between what federal agencies said publicly and what the same agencies documented internally. Most of the notes here deal with a single question: when a public statement says 'nothing anomalous' and a FOIA release later shows the same agency had already mapped the cases to commercial aircraft, where does the record actually sit?

Hub: the public-vs-internal split

• The New Jersey drone wave had two sets of answers - the November-December 2024 wave, the 17 December 2024 TSA internal slideshow, and the May 2025 FOIA release. The main hub piece.

County-density and U.S. cluster analysis

• A county-density look at the Wisconsin UAP cluster - ties a single light report to county-density context, NUFORC, AARO, Vandenberg, and Volk Field caveats.

Federal records and FOIA

• The UFO contractor gap the FOIA machine keeps revealing - ties the Loeb council, AARO historical report, Burlison MITRE/MIT Lincoln records requests, and Elizondo's FOIA/private-company answer.
• The 'four alien species' claim is a media-chain story - the source, the compression, the official baseline, and the evidence still missing.

What to watch next

The next move on this lane is rarely a bigger adjective. It is a FOIA release that adds new internal documents, a House or Senate hearing transcript that quotes an unredacted TSA or DHS line, or a New Jersey state-level investigation that publishes a case-by-case breakdown of the 5,000+ tips the FBI collected in November-December 2024. When any of those surfaces, the gap between the two records gets shorter or wider in the public record, and the UAP Logbook notes here will track it.