Short Note / Jun 02, 2026

Air Materiel Command, December 1947: "Flying discs still a matter of concern"

publisher
UAP Logbook
editor
Jan
status
public note

Almost 80 years ago, the Air Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson wrote to the Chief of Staff of the new United States Air Force and asked, politely, for a reply. The reply had not come. The subject was flying discs. The memo is now public in PURSUE Release 01, and the friction in it is the kind that runs all the way through to today's UFO file.

On 9 December 1947, the Air Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson sent a memo to the Chief of Staff of the new United States Air Force. The subject line read, in typewritten capitals: FLYING DISCS.

The body was three sentences long. The first said the memo confirmed a conversation with Major General L. C. Craigie. The second asked for a reply that had not come. The third said AMC was still working on the matter.

Comments of Headquarters, Air Force on these letters have never been received by this Command. Continued and recent reports from qualified observers concerning this phenomenon still makes this matter one of concern to Headquarters, Air Materiel Command. Intelligence Department of this Command is continuing the collection and analysis of all available reports.

Source-derived scan of the first page of the December 1947 Air Materiel Command memo to the Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, subject 'Flying Discs', with the typewritten 'AIR MATERIEL COMMAND' letterhead and the 'TO: Chief of Staff' routing block.
Source scan of the first page of the December 1947 Air Materiel Command memo to the Chief of Staff, subject "Flying Discs". The page is part of the file Flying Disc Sightings and Air Materiel Command Correspondence Volume 2, now public in PURSUE Release 01 on war.gov/UFO.

The attached list of enclosures is where the document does its real work. It cc's two earlier memos, one dated 23 September 1947 with the subject "AMC Opinion Concerning 'Flying Discs'" — the Twining Memo — and one dated 24 September 1947. It also attaches an "Analysis of 'Flying Disc' Reports."

Twining's actual line

The Twining Memo is the line every UAP history book quotes: "the phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious." That is the famous 1947 sentence. The less-quoted sentence is in the FBI file from the same year. A Portland aviation editor, Leaveritt G. Richards, told the FBI that he had phoned Major General Twining at Wright-Patterson, and from the call he got the impression that the Air Force had launched its 1947 interviews "to wash out the disc reports, since they are definitely not of AAF origin."

Two sentences. One says discs are real. The other says the Air Force is trying to close the matter. Both are 1947. Both are public record.

What the December memo tells you

By December 1947, the first line of what would become the U.S. UFO file was three months old. The Chief of Staff had not responded. AMC was writing again to flag that, and to keep the file moving.

There is no alien in this memo. There is no flying object, no photograph, no sensor data, no Estimate of the Situation. There is a bureaucracy at Wright-Patterson saying: we are still collecting, the higher office has not answered, please send a reply.

The reply eventually came. Project Sign opened in January 1948. The rest of the chain — Project Grudge, Project Blue Book, the Condon Report, AATIP, AARO, PURSUE — runs downhill from this single December afternoon when a Lieutenant Colonel at AMC asked for a piece of paper back.

Why this is news now

The December 1947 memo is in PURSUE Release 01, published on war.gov/UFO on 8 May 2026, as part of the file Flying Disc Sightings and Air Materiel Command Correspondence Volume 2. The 1970s FOIA version of the same file is on the same war.gov portal with more redactions. The public now has both, side by side, for the first time. The same founding document appears, with less ink, in the second PURSUE release and the AARO and PURSUE topic hub.

What changed is not the conclusion. The Chief of Staff did eventually answer. The phenomenon is still on the file. What changed is the read access: the institutional answer is no longer behind a stamp.

Sources

mailing list / notes

Occasional notes by email.

New release notes, case files, and useful corrections. Sent occasionally, not on a fixed schedule.

You will get a confirmation email. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy details.

Check your inbox to confirm the subscription.