News / Jul 09, 2026

The March 2025 China UFO wave that one Sohu blog turned into a 'study'

publisher
UAP Logbook
editor
Jan
status
public note

In early March 2025, glowing objects crossed the night sky over Yunnan, Guizhou, and Hunan. CCTV had already noted the "seven-planet alignment" was a non-event. Three named local astronomers said the videos showed re-entry debris. One Sohu blog called it a "study." The public record has the first three versions. It does not have the fourth.

Editorial illustration of a sepia parchment map of southern China showing Yunnan, Guizhou, and Hunan provinces with three small rust pin markers at the named sighting clusters and a tracked caption.
Editorial illustration by UAP Logbook. It represents the three Chinese provinces where the March 2025 wave was reported. It is not source imagery.

Just after midnight on 1 March 2025, clips of a bright object streaking across the sky over Yunnan, Guizhou, and Hunan started circulating on Chinese social media. NetEase, Tencent News, Douyin, and Weibo all picked up versions of the same footage within hours — a fireball with a long tail, climbing, then vanishing.

The timing was not an accident. For weeks beforehand, Chinese social media had been buzzing about a "七星连珠" — a seven-planet alignment billed as a once-in-77-years cosmic event. CCTV had already pushed back on the hype on 28 February 2025, noting that of the seven planets involved, only three (Venus, Jupiter, and Mars) would actually be visible to the naked eye. Saturn was being lost in the dusk glow, Neptune required a large-aperture telescope, Uranus sat at the edge of unaided visibility, and Mercury was a difficult catch close to the western horizon. Beijing Planetarium's outreach team added that "77-year" framing was a numerical coincidence over a long timescale, not a defined event.

That correction did not stop the UFO clips from getting folded into the same wave of excitement once they started spreading.

Three astronomers, three mundane explanations

Tan Wei, president of the Hunan Astronomical Society, told Sanxiang City News (三湘都市报) on 2 March 2025 that the viral footage did not match the timeline people were claiming for it. "It looks like an orbital vehicle breaking up on re-entry," he said. "It might not be from 1 March. It might be older footage cut together and captioned to ride the 'seven-planet' hype."

Cao Jun, an amateur astronomer in Liuyang who runs his own backyard observatory, was blunter to the same paper: the objects could be satellites, meteors, or camera artefacts — and some of the clips circulating, he said, might not even be recent, or might be AI-generated entirely.

In Yunnan, Miao Yingda of the Yunnan Amateur Astronomy Association told Kunming's 8099999 Street Corners programme on 5 March 2025 that the bright object Yunnan residents filmed that night lasted several minutes, which ruled out a meteor outright — those burn for seconds. His read: human-made spacecraft debris re-entering from orbit.

Shi Wei, deputy researcher at the Shanghai Planetarium's exhibition and education centre, went after the alignment claim itself. "Seven-planet alignment" is not a defined astronomical term, he told reporters — planets line up to varying degrees every year, and what actually happened in late February 2025 was seven planets spread across a 117° arc of sky, wider than a similar 2022 event but not a unique threshold. Tan Wei made the same point more bluntly: calling it an alignment "overstates the geometry" of something that happens, in some loose sense, constantly.

Where the "study" came from

None of that stopped a Sohu post from turning the story into something that sounds like science. Published on 2 March 2025 under a self-publishing account called 匠人小马, the post claims that a team of unnamed "experts" ran a four-step analysis — astronomical correlation, atmospheric modelling, airspace cross-checks, and witness verification — and concluded that the sightings were caused by a geomagnetic storm (Kp index 7), a high-speed solar wind stream, and a 300 percent spike in atmospheric density interacting with spacecraft debris. It also claims to have detected "spacecraft coating spectral signatures" in the wreckage.

No author is named. No institution is credited. No data, no paper, no method beyond the four bullet points. Sohu's own platform disclaimer, printed directly below the post, says as much: the views belong to the author alone, and Sohu only hosts the content. Every English-language write-up that repeated the "Kp=7" and "spacecraft coating" language in the weeks after traces back to this single unverified post.

The mystical coda

There is also a political-mystical coda to the story that rarely made it into mainstream Chinese coverage. Within days of the sightings, overseas Chinese-language outlets including the Falun Gong-affiliated Secret China (看中國新聞網) tied the same "七星连珠" to a pre-existing prophecy cycle: that the Chinese Communist Party would "begin with a snake and end with a snake" (蛇始蛇終), with the implication that 2025 — the Year of the Snake, and Xi Jinping's benmingnian — would be the year of collapse. The UFO clips were folded into that frame as omen rather than as orbital debris.

It is worth naming because it shows how many unrelated narratives attached themselves to the same viral footage once it started moving. A non-event, a recycled clip, a misframed astronomical alignment, a self-published blog dressed up as a study, and a millenarian prophecy were all reading the same sky at the same time.

What is actually on the record

Stripped down, the public record has four versions of this story and they do not carry equal weight.

Three of them are attributed. CCTV's 28 February visibility note is signed by name and station. Tan Wei, Cao Jun, Miao Yingda, and Shi Wei all spoke on the record with named outlets in the first week of March 2025, and all four gave mundane explanations for what people saw. None of them described an anomaly.

The fourth version is the Sohu "study." It has no author, no institutional backing, no dataset, and no paper. It is a self-published blog post that happens to use scientific-sounding numbers.

Nobody at the China National Space Administration, the China Manned Space Agency, or any provincial aerospace bureau has gone on record about the object. The "study" that gave the story its scientific gloss has no author anyone can name. The China-Russia UAP retrieval claim that surfaced three months later, in mid-June 2026, also does not name this wave as part of any larger recovery narrative.

What would move this from hype to record

To turn this from a hype cycle into something the public record has to take seriously would need actual documentation. That would be a peer-reviewed paper with named authors and a dataset, original video metadata showing when and where the clips were actually filmed, radar tracks from a civilian or military aviation authority, or an official statement from CNSA or a provincial weather or aerospace bureau naming the object. None of that exists yet.

What exists is one blog post dressed up to look like research, and three astronomers who said, on the record, what they thought they were actually looking at.

Related UAP Logbook reading

Sources

mailing list / notes

Occasional notes by email.

New release notes, case files, and useful corrections. Sent occasionally, not on a fixed schedule.

You will get a confirmation email. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy details.

Check your inbox to confirm the subscription.